President Trump has been vocal
regarding his intent to abolish DACA which was instituted by a June 15, 2012
memorandum written by DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano. President Trump’s draft executive order
entitled Ending Unconstitutional Executive Amnesties, leaked back in January of 2017, contemplates putting an end to the program by not accepting any new
applications or renewals. Current DACA
recipients would be allowed to work until the expiration date of their work permits. Since the leaked memo has become known to
public, however, President Trump has made a number of confusing statements
regarding his plans for DACA recipients signaling a potential change of heart
regarding this issue.
Although
we do not know what the future of the DACA program holds, we do know that as of
March 16, 2017 the program remains in force.
When
faced with a decision as to whether renew DACA, every applicant faces a number
of questions such as:
1.
Can information provided on a DACA applications be used for immigration
enforcement purposes?
2.
Are the costs and waiting times worth it?
3.
Should I travel on an Advance Parole?
As DACA was created via
executive order, there is no statutory protection against enforcement actions
offered to DACA recipients. Information
provided on DACA application cannot be shared with ICE or CBP for immigration
enforcement purposes unless the applicant meets specific criteria, but it can
be shared for other purposes like fraud investigation.
Applicants with complicated
immigration history including, for example, prior removal orders or any type of
criminal history, would benefit from a consultation with an experienced
immigration attorney to verify their eligibility and ascertain the risks
associated with making an affirmative application.
The applicants who are already
participating in DACA and have had any recent contacts with law enforcement or
immigration police would not likely incur any additional risks by filing for
renewal as their information is already known to the government.
DACA recipients should only
contemplate foreign travel with a valid and current advance parole. As CBP took
a position that even with a valid advance parole admission to the U.S., it is
up to CBP’s discretion to admit an individual or deny entry. The current administration has signaled that
the advance parole program will be curtailed in the future and used more
sparingly. Having said that, certain
DACA recipients may benefit from an entry to U.S. on an advance parole on both
personal and procedural levels; for example, when faced with a bar to
adjustment due to prior entry without inspection. The decision to exercise this option should
be made on an individual basis and the applicant should ensure that he or she
understands the risks associated with seeking re-entry to the U.S.
Putting aside all the
uncertainties surrounding the DACA program, the DACA community consists of
millions of individuals, (as of
September 30, 2016, CIS has approved approximately 750,000 initial DACA applications and 580,000
renewal requests) and is a force that President Trump needs to take into
account when making decisions regarding future of this program.